![]() ![]() It includes profiles for most of the popular printers and it offers a lot of customization. This is because Cura is an opensource slicer with good support for a lot of printers. Why IdeaMaker instead of Cura?Ī lot of people start their 3D printing journey with Cura. It’s a closed source slicer, but I don’t mind this considering it’s been more consistent and stable compared to Cura. It is designed to work with their Raise 3D printers, but it allows adding aftermarket printers with custom profiles. This is the software you use when preparing a model to be printed on your machine. Cura includes it by default as of version 5.IdeaMaker is a free 3D slicing software made by Raise 3D. Super Slicer, our favorite slicing program includes it as of version 2.5.59. The outer perimeter will run along the outer surface of the part as before, but the inner perimeters will be rounded, smoothing the part's shell internally and avoiding the accumulation of stresses that occur at the corners. This motor is more precise in calculating the amount of material to be deposited in each extrusion, and it also rounds each additional perimeter, so our printer will make smoother and more precise movements that have an impact on the final finish. Here we will notice a huge improvement, as the filling of holes is more precise, and we will also need fewer passes, so we will have sharper and cleaner results. With this type of parts we have the same problem as with boxes and casings, aggravated by the fact that we cannot choose the thicknesses freely, since they will depend on the geometry of the part, in some areas we will have excessively thin hollow fillings and in other areas excessively thick, which can also mean a worse surface finish, with this engine these problems are largely avoided. ![]() Propellers and thin pieces with variable diameters.If we wanted to use a thickness of 2.1mm for example, I would make 4 passes of 0.5, and an additional pass of 0.1 to fill the gap, which would be a waste of time.Īrachne will spread that 0.1 between adjacent perimeters, avoiding the need for the additional pass. For example, if we use an extrusion width of 0.5, we can use thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3mm so that these walls are made with 2, 4, and 6 passes respectively. Until now, when making a box or housing with thin walls, such as the electronics box for our 3D printers, we had to use thicknesses that are multiples of the extrusion width we want to use. Type of parts in which it can be an advantage: It should be noted that it may have a trade-off, by using variable width it is possible that we may have more flow changes in some prints, and this may worsen the results in bowden 3D printers and/or with poorly calibrated "Pressure advance". Not only does it give more precise results, but we will also print faster. In this way, the extrusion width is not only linked to the nozzle diameter, but is also adjusted according to the geometry of the area to be filled, avoiding gaps and additional passes in many cases. This solution is fine, it works perfectly, but Arachne brings us something better: variable width perimeters. Until now, the perimeter generators used a static extrusion width, linked to the nozzle width, this generated in some areas "Holes", which could later be filled with additional passes if we activate "fill holes", these passes do have a variable width depending on the space left. What advantages does it have over classic perimeter generators? It is the new perimeter generator, developed by Ultimaker for Cura, and implemented also in Slic3r-based programs like Super Slicer and Prusa Slicer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |